ArticleCJC open2026
Elucidating the Relationship Between Pacemaker Heart Rates and Pulse Pressure: A Clue to Optimal Programming in Elderly Patients with Cardiovascular Risk.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Low diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and high pulse pressure (PP), markers of vascular stiffness, are linked to higher stroke risk and cognitive impairment. Increasing resting heart rate (HR) in pacemaker patients could lower PP and enhance cerebral perfusion. This study examines how raising resting HR affects PP in patients with higher vascular risk. Methods: A cross-sectional interventional study involved 21 patients (mean age, 77 years; 9 male, 12 female) over age 65 years with dual-chamber permanent pacemakers and normal ventricular function. Hemodynamic parameters were measured at 5-minute intervals at baseline and every 10 beats per minute (bpm) up to 100 bpm using the Finapres NOVA plethysmograph. The effects of higher pacing rates on PP, systolic BP, DBP, and cardiac output were analyzed. Results: Increasing resting HR significantly reduced PP (p < 0.001) from a median of 71 mmHg at 60 bpm to 53 mmHg at 100 bpm. No significant changes were found in systolic blood pressure ( Conclusions: An increased HR to 70 bpm reduced PP in most patients with dual-chamber permanent pacemakers and sinus rhythm, suggesting a way to improve hemodynamics in patients with poor vascular compliance. Customized HR settings may optimize PP and reduce the risk of cognitive decline or stroke. Further research is needed to evaluate for risks of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy in individuals requiring frequent ventricular pacing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.