ArticleCJC open2026
Real-world Persistence on Selexipag for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Canada.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Safety and tolerability of selexipag in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was demonstrated in a phase 3 clinical trial. In this trial, up to 14% of patients receiving selexipag over a median period of 70 weeks prematurely discontinued therapy due to adverse events. However, no data are available on real-world persistence on selexipag in Canada. This study aimed to describe selexipag short and long-term persistence, and predictors of persistence in the Canadian population. Methods: This retrospective claims-database analysis included adult PAH patients with ≥ 1 selexipag claim between April 2016 and July 2021. Patients were followed for a maximum of 64 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of persistence were calculated from the index date to the earliest date of discontinuation or censoring. Four models were used to select predictors of persistence, and the 12 most important features based on average rank were built into a Cox proportional hazards model to assess the impact of these predictors on patient persistence with selexipag. Results: A total of 311 patients (70% female; 71% aged 50-79 years) were included in the study. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of persistence at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 76.1%, 61.7%, 48.3%, and 40.2% respectively. The median duration of persistence for the overall cohort was 22 months. No predictors in the final model were significant. Conclusions: Real-world data from the Canadian population suggest a low level of long-term persistence on selexipag, although the level of persistence is similar to reported rates for other PAH therapies. Further research into predictors of selexipag persistence is needed to help optimize potential treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.