ArticleCJC open2026
Women's Cardiovascular Health and Cardiac Rehabilitation: a Priority-setting Partnership.
Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of preventable deaths in Canadian women. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a risk reduction program that can enhance and maintain cardiovascular health through individualized programming. Participation can reduce future events by up to 50%. However, women are less likely to access CR than men. A collaborative research agenda is needed to address women's priorities for CR, incorporating the input of people with lived and living experience (PWLLE), whose needs are often left unmet. The objective of this study was to engage PWLLE of CVD and clinicians in Canada to identify and prioritize research questions about CR for women. Methods: James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership was conducted. An initial survey collected questions about women's CR from PWLLE and clinicians. In a second survey, PWLLE and clinicians shortlisted the questions. The questions were prioritized at in-person workshop. Results: The first survey collected 1347 questions from 172 respondents: 74.3% women with lived experience of cardiovascular condition(s) and/or procedure(s), 10.5% family, friends, caregivers, and 23.4% clinicians. Out-of-scope submissions were removed. The remaining 715 were grouped and summarized, resulting in 52 summary questions. There were 250 responses to the second survey, which was used to create a shortlist of 25 questions. At the workshop, PWLLE and clinicians (n = 22) identified the top 10 priorities namely, individualization; women-only CR; follow-up; referral criteria; education; optimization; nutritional counselling; rural access; and exercise safety/progression. Conclusion: These priorities were established through PWLLE-clinician consensus and provide a framework for future CR research in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.