Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41766694›Full record

ArticleCJC open2026

Women's Cardiovascular Health and Cardiac Rehabilitation: a Priority-setting Partnership.

Racquel K Brown, Monica Parry, Paul Oh, Lisa Cotie, Jennifer Harris, Mireille Landry, Patrice Lindsay, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Karen Minden, Kerri-Anne Mullen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CJC open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Racquel K BrownRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Monica ParryLawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul OhKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa CotieKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer HarrisUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mireille LandryDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patrice LindsayHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marilyn MacKay-LyonsSchool of Physical Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Karen MindenKITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Program, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kerri-Anne MullenUniversity of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sharon L MulvaghDivision of Cardiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Tamara RaderJames Lind Alliance, Canada's Drugs Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Jennifer BethellRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tracey J F ColellaRehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of preventable deaths in Canadian women. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a risk reduction program that can enhance and maintain cardiovascular health through individualized programming. Participation can reduce future events by up to 50%. However, women are less likely to access CR than men. A collaborative research agenda is needed to address women's priorities for CR, incorporating the input of people with lived and living experience (PWLLE), whose needs are often left unmet. The objective of this study was to engage PWLLE of CVD and clinicians in Canada to identify and prioritize research questions about CR for women. Methods: James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership was conducted. An initial survey collected questions about women's CR from PWLLE and clinicians. In a second survey, PWLLE and clinicians shortlisted the questions. The questions were prioritized at in-person workshop. Results: The first survey collected 1347 questions from 172 respondents: 74.3% women with lived experience of cardiovascular condition(s) and/or procedure(s), 10.5% family, friends, caregivers, and 23.4% clinicians. Out-of-scope submissions were removed. The remaining 715 were grouped and summarized, resulting in 52 summary questions. There were 250 responses to the second survey, which was used to create a shortlist of 25 questions. At the workshop, PWLLE and clinicians (n = 22) identified the top 10 priorities namely, individualization; women-only CR; follow-up; referral criteria; education; optimization; nutritional counselling; rural access; and exercise safety/progression. Conclusion: These priorities were established through PWLLE-clinician consensus and provide a framework for future CR research in women.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasecardiovascular rehabilitationpatient engagementpriority setting partnershipwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID41766694
PMCPMC12946797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.