ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2026
The changing landscape of urothelial carcinoma: on the edge of a paradigm shift.
Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron Oxide Nanozyme for Magnetothermal Activation of ER-TRPV1 Enables Efficient Intravesical Therapy of Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Post-IMvigor011 Era: CtDNA-Guided Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment Stratification in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urothelial cancers of the urinary tract are the fourth most common malignancy in men, with a shifting demographic affecting younger patients and an increasing incidence in females. In this Review, we discuss recent discoveries and paradigm-shifting clinical trials that impact all stages of urothelial cancer. New therapeutics and drug-delivery devices have led to multiple approvals for treatments of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. The addition of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and antibody-drug conjugates is transforming perioperative treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The use of liquid biomarkers, circulating tumor DNA, and urinary tumor DNA is aiding the identification of patients at risk for local recurrence and possibly those who can avoid systemic therapy. Finally, integrating biomarkers and systemic treatments is creating a paradigm that could lead to the successful treatment of bladder cancer without requiring bladder removal. Overall, these advancements in biomarkers and novel therapeutics are likely to dramatically improve survival for bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.