ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
ORANGE: a machine learning approach for modeling tissue-specific aging from transcriptomic data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite aging being a fundamental biological process that profoundly influences health and disease, the interplay between tissue-specific aging and mortality remains underexplored. This study applies machine learning on GTEx transcriptomic data to model tissue-specific biological ages across 12 different types of tissues and introduces an age-gap metric to quantify deviations from the chronological age. We use several modeling techniques optimized with three feature selection strategies: Pearson correlation, age-related differentially expressed genes, and tissue-enriched genes (expressed at least four-fold higher in a specific tissue). Among these, Pearson correlation combined with elastic net regression yields the best performance, with models achieving an average root mean squared error of 6.44 years and an R2 of 0.64. To quantify deviations from chronological age relative to the population, we train neural networks to regress predicted ages against chronological ages, and subtract their outputs from the predicted ages to calculate a metric that we call the age-gap. Age-gap statistics reveal significant tissue-specific aging patterns, identifying extreme agers and correlations between extreme aging and mortality. About 20% of subjects are found to exhibit extreme aging in one tissue, while 1% show multi-organ aging. Further analysis reveals that accelerated aging in specific tissues correlates with greater risk of death from illness. These findings greatly emphasize the role of transcriptomics in aging research and its implications for health and longevity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.