ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2026
From Preservation to Creation: The Expanding Frontier of Fertility Preservation - Proceedings of the 2
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fertility preservation (FP) has become an essential dimension of modern medicine, reflecting the paradigm shift from survival alone to survivorship. Once confined to oncology, FP now spans a broad spectrum of medical, social, and technological contexts. Surgical innovations, including fertility-sparing surgery and ovarian transposition, allow reproductive potential to be safeguarded without compromising oncological safety. Cryobiology has been transformed by the transition from slow-freezing to vitrification, establishing oocyte and embryo cryopreservation as gold-standard approaches with outcomes comparable to fresh cycles. Alongside onco-fertility, "social freezing" has emerged as a tool of reproductive autonomy, though it raises counselling and ethical challenges related to age, expectations, and equity of access. Resilience in FP also requires psychosocial support: while emotional distress is common, evidence shows that interventions such as mindfulness and structured counselling improve mental health even if conception outcomes remain unchanged. In parallel, ovarian tissue cryopreservation for patients unable to undergo stimulation and immature testicular tissue banking extend possibilities, with early clinical successes highlighting future translational pathways. Uterus transplantation has emerged as the first-line treatment of congenital absence of a uterus and can restore fertility after a hysterectomy performed for cervical cancer. Looking ahead, regenerative approaches, including stem-cell-based strategies, 3D bio-printing of genital tissues, tissue engineering, and artificial uterus systems, signal the next frontier, while underscoring the need for further research as well as robust ethical, legal, and safety frameworks. FP thus represents a multidisciplinary and rapidly evolving field that integrates oncology, reproductive medicine, gynaecology, transplantation surgery, psychology, and laboratory disciplines. Its trajectory is defined by both technological innovation and the imperative to align medical progress with patient autonomy, equity, and long-term quality of life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.