ReviewMedicine2026
Tumor-like cortical venous thrombosis: Case report and literature review.
Review in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning prediction of postoperative pulmonary embolism: a multicenter external validation study highlighting inflammatory response and intraoperative hemodynamics.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleIsolated cortical venous thrombosis (ICoVT) is a rare type of cerebral venous thrombosis. Because of its atypical clinical presentation and imaging features that resemble those of brain tumors, ICoVT is often misdiagnosed as a brain tumor. PATIENT CONCERNS: This study reports 2 patients with ICoVT. Both experienced a gradual onset of symptoms-one presented primarily with headache, whereas the other developed progressive limb weakness. DIAGNOSES AND
interventionsBrain magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large hemorrhagic lesion in 1 patient, showing ring enhancement and extensive surrounding edema. The other patient had an ischemic lesion with similar ring enhancement and marked perilesional edema. OUTCOMES: Given the suspicion of a brain tumor, both patients underwent surgical biopsy. Intraoperatively, cortical venous thrombosis was identified, and histopathological findings confirmed the diagnosis of ICoVT. Both patients subsequently received effective anticoagulant therapy. LESSONS: ICoVT has atypical clinical and imaging characteristics and is easily mistaken for brain tumors. When neuroimaging demonstrates cortical hemorrhage or ischemic lesions accompanied by extensive edema, the possibility of ICoVT should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.