Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41766465›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2026

Time to Sedation and Analgesia After Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department.

Callum Barnden, Biswadev Mitra, Amit Maini, Christopher Groombridge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Callum BarndenEmergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-0423-898X
Biswadev MitraEmergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0508-2450
Amit MainiEmergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Christopher GroombridgeEmergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2336-1525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRapid sequence intubation (RSI) is a common procedure within the Emergency Department. "Sedation gap"-the time between induction and post intubation sedation-has been associated with adverse outcomes. The aim of this study was to measure the median time to sedation or analgesia post intubation in adult patients within an Australian Emergency Department (ED). The secondary aim was to assess the difference in "sedation gap" among medical and trauma patient cohorts.

methodsThe retrospective study was conducted using data within a 12-month period at an Australian adult tertiary referral hospital emergency department. Data were sourced from an online airway registry and electronic medical records. Time to sedation or analgesia was summarised as median with interquartile range.

resultsThere were 158 patients included in the study. Overall median time to sedation was 7.5 min (IQR 4.0-14.0). This did not differ significantly between medical and trauma patient groups (8.0 min [IQR, 4-18 min] vs. 7.0 min [IQR, 4-13 min]). For induction of anaesthesia the main sedative agent was ketamine (n = 120, 75.9%) and paralytic agent rocuronium (n = 151, 95.6%). First attempt success rate was 95.6% (n = 151).

conclusionsWe observed a median time of 7.5 min between paralysis and administration of post-intubation sedation or analgesia within an Australian ED. Ongoing surveillance with strategies to minimise "sedation gap" is indicated.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaIntubation, IntratrachealProcedural SedationRapid Sequence Induction and IntubationAdultAgedAustraliaEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsHypnotics and Sedativesanalgesiaemergency departmentemergency medicinerapid sequence intubationsedation

Identifiers

PMID41766465
PMCPMC12951208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.