ArticleInternational journal of cosmetic science2026
Enhancing the reliability of skin tone evaluation: A study of full-face imaging devices with colour calibration.
Article in International journal of cosmetic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkin colour measurement is common and essential to clinical evaluation, especially for product efficacy evaluation and research on skin tone and pigmentary disorders. Among multiple evaluation methods, full-face imaging analysis has become increasingly valuable thanks to attractive visuals, trackability, algorithm optimization, etc. Today, numerous imaging devices are available on the market, employing diffuse light or cross-polarized light. While most systems control their light source output during manufacturing, lack of precise colour calibration and variations between devices remain the key barriers for product efficacy evaluation for skin tone.
objectiveThis research aims to enhance the reliability of colour measurement by validating two representative full-face imaging devices for clinical objective evaluation. Using a ColorChecker during image capture will allow colour calibration to standardized lighting conditions, thus mitigating device-specific variations and improving the reliability of skin colour measurements.
methodsA 4-week clinical study investigated two imaging devices employing different light sources. A ColorChecker was included in each image capture. Initial analysis of each colour patch assessed the inherent colour accuracy and stability of both devices. Subsequently, image colour calibration was applied to standardize colours to a reference colour under standard light source. Further analysis then evaluated whether this calibration improved the devices' capabilities in measuring skin tone.
resultsThere is a disparity in the colour measurement capabilities of the two investigated devices. By incorporating a standard ColorChecker within the field of view and implementing image colour calibration through use of a polynomial regression model, colour accuracy and system stability has been enhanced, thus improving the reliability of colour assessment in clinical evaluation and reducing the inconsistencies between devices.
conclusionsThis study offers insights into colour measurement for skin tone evaluation, demonstrating the value of using a ColorChecker and colour calibration to ensure reliable and accurate skin tone measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.