ArticleThe oncologist2026
Multifocality as a marker of aggressiveness in medullary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis of lymph node metastasis and recurrence.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic role of multifocality in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is controversial. This study evaluated multifocality's association with aggressiveness, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and survival, focusing on multifocality-related parameters (such as number of tumor foci, tumor diameter).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 186 MTC cases (136 unifocal, 50 multifocal) with a median 59-month follow-up (95% CI: 52-66). Multivariate logistic analysis and Cox regression models assessed multifocality's impact on LNM and recurrence, with detailed subgroup analyses. Diagnostic performance of tumor size parameters was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, while survival outcomes were assessed via Kaplan-Meier method.
resultsMultifocal tumors exhibited significantly more aggressive features, including: (1) higher preoperative calcitonin (1226.7 ± 751.9 vs 706.6 ± 704.2 ng/L, P < .001); (2) increased capsular invasion (68% vs 32%, odds ratio [OR] = 5.8, 95% CI: 2.32-14.53); and (3) more frequent intraglandular spread (54% vs 18%, OR = 6.05, 95% CI: 1.47-24.92). Multifocality independently predicted both LNM (OR = 3.35, 95% CI: 1.22-9.25, P = .019) and recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.59, 95% CI: 2.48-17.53, P < .001). ROC analysis identified optimal LNM cut-offs at 13.5 mm (largest focus) and 16.5 mm (total tumor diameter). Subgroup analyses revealed: (1) bifocal conferred highest LNM risk (OR = 8.51 vs unifocal, 95% CI: 1.74-41.69, P = .008); (2) recurrence risk showed dose-response relationship with lesion number (bifocal: HR = 4.89, 95% CI: 1.88-12.70, P = .001; ≥3 foci: HR = 5.86, 95% CI: 1.54-22.33, P = .01). Survival analysis demonstrated significantly worse progression-free survival in multifocal cases (P < .001), persisting beyond 2 years (P = .001), though overall survival difference was nonsignificant (P = .168).
conclusionMultifocal MTC exhibits aggressive behavior with high LNM and recurrence risks, driven by the number of tumor foci, demonstrating a dose-response relationship. These findings support incorporating multifocality into risk stratification for optimized management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.