Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41766352›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2026

Transportation insecurity, loneliness, and emotional support among individuals with a history of cancer.

Elizabeth C Danielson, Rishika Chikoti, James W Griffith, Ryan P Merkow, Hamid Dashti, Ted A Skolarus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth C DanielsonSurgical Implementation & Health Services Research (SIHSR), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2792-7140
Rishika ChikotiSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-6981-654X
James W GriffithComprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4840-8692
Ryan P MerkowSurgical Implementation & Health Services Research (SIHSR), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8752-4653
Hamid DashtiResearch Computing Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9397-3458
Ted A SkolarusSurgical Implementation & Health Services Research (SIHSR), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5859-8151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCancer survivors are at-risk for transportation insecurity given the frequency of medical visits and cost of care. Little is known about how transportation insecurity relates to important social relationship measures adversely impacting cancer survivors (eg, loneliness, lack of emotional support). Thus, we evaluated the association between transportation insecurity and social relationship measures among patients with and without a history of cancer.

methodsUsing data from the 2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we characterized relationships between transportation insecurity and 2 social relationship measures: (1) loneliness and (2) emotional support among individuals with and without a history of cancer. We used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate associations between transportation insecurity and adverse social relationships, with sensitivity analyses for at-risk groups. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and health-related covariates.

resultsWe identified 237 180 respondents with 29 579 reporting a history of cancer (12.5%). Transportation insecurity was more common among individuals who were younger, non-White, uninsured or publicly insured, unemployed, unable to work, and not partnered. Transportation insecurity was associated with both social relationship measures (loneliness: aOR = 1.24-3.00, 95% CI = 1.11 to 3.54; lack of emotional support aOR = 1.31-2.47, 95% CI = 1.19 to 2.84). Although these associations were consistent across cancer and non-cancer populations, in univariate analyses individuals with a history of cancer reported transportation insecurity more often if they were younger (18-49 years), non-White, had Medicaid, or no insurance compared to those without a history of cancer.

conclusionsThese findings highlight intersections between transportation insecurity and unmet social relationship needs among individuals with and without a history of cancer.

Indexed as

LonelinessNeoplasmsSocial SupportSurvivorsTransportationAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMedically UninsuredMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41766352
PMCPMC13125876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.