ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Integration of complementary and alternative medicine in the Indian health system: how the state inadvertently undermines policy implementation.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
India's AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy) integration policy emphasizes medical pluralism. However, implementation occurs within a complex health system where the state apparatus, through its governance and policy processes, affects health services and outcomes. This study explores how state and policy complexities shape AYUSH integration processes and practitioners' capacities in primary healthcare. Qualitative research was conducted in an eastern Indian state and involved observations (19 days) and interviews (37) with AYUSH doctors, biomedical doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and administrators. Thematic analysis enabled identification of themes. State-level employment rules placed AYUSH doctors on low-paid, short-term rolling contracts, but the effects of this marginalized position were intensified by irregular AYUSH medicine supplies and shared governance between two directorates. Governance of integrative facilities and AYUSH medicine stock-outs shifted practice patterns towards biomedical treatments by AYUSH doctors to keep health services functioning, which increased biomedicine demand and further narrowed the scope of AYUSH in a self-reinforcing cycle. Inter-departmental collaboration between the directorates was fragmented, lacking accountability and prioritization of AYUSH integration activities. Limitations in AYUSH medicines and the absence of promotional campaigns narrowed the scope of AYUSH services and facilitated the 'biomedicalization' of AYUSH integration. Local governance bodies offered occasional support, but their involvement was neither formalized nor consistent. Thus, integration processes emerged not from linear policy structures but from feedback mechanisms in which changes in policy priorities at the state and district levels produced disproportionate effects on AYUSH integration, demonstrating a system responsive to resource and information flows. Achieving medical pluralism will require adaptive governance: setting iterative integration targets, establishing cross-directorate collaboration and learning platforms, and increasing the resource independence of AYUSH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.