ReviewIndian journal of pharmacology2026
Reporting and critical appraisal of evidence-based research: Making the journal club most effective.
Review in Indian journal of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractEvidence-based research (EBR) has become a cornerstone in the scientific, medical, and social sciences disciplines, informing decision-making processes and advancing knowledge across various fields. Evidence-based practice emphasizes integration of EBR, clinical expertise, and patient preferences to guide clinical practice. However, the mere existence of research evidence is not enough; it is essential to critically appraise the evidence to ensure its reliability, validity, and relevance to the context in which it is applied. Critical appraisal involves systematically evaluating the design, methodology, results, and conclusions of a research study to assess its quality and applicability. This article will provide an in-depth insight about reporting and critical appraisal of EBR, examining the principles of critical appraisal, available tools for reporting and appraising a research paper, challenges faced in critical appraisal, and how to make the most of the journal club.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.