Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41766050›Full record

ArticleVisual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art2026

UMIAD-EGMF: unsupervised medical image anomaly detection based on edge guidance and multi-scale flow fusion.

Zhirong Li, Guangfeng Lin, Dou Zhang, Rongxin Huang, Jing Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhirong LiInformation Science Department, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, 710048, Shaanxi Province, China.
Guangfeng LinInformation Science Department, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, 710048, Shaanxi Province, China. lgf78103@xaut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6191-1102
Dou ZhangInformation Science Department, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, 710048, Shaanxi Province, China.
Rongxin HuangInformation Science Department, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an, 710048, Shaanxi Province, China.
Jing YangState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging technology has advanced rapidly in recent years; however, abnormalities in medical images are often rare and complex, making sample labels difficult to obtain for supervised learning of detection models. Existing unsupervised anomaly detection methods, which are the mainstream approaches, often struggle with issues such as blurred edges and varying scales of abnormal regions. To address these issues, a novel unsupervised method for medical image anomaly detection is proposed: unsupervised medical image anomaly detection based on edge guidance and multi-scale flow fusion (UMIAD-EGMF). This method excavates rich edge information with scale adaptation and progressively identifies discriminative information for anomaly detection. UMIAD-EGMF captures contextual information around anomaly boundaries via low-level feature fusion (enhancing boundary details with the edge guidance module; EGM), integrates EGM-extracted edge information into deeper features using the edge aggregation module, and merges multi-scale feature maps to capture common anomaly features (subtle and significant) through multi-scale flow fusion. Experiments on breast ultrasound images (BUSI), brain magnetic resonance imaging (brain MRI), and head computed tomography (head CT) datasets demonstrate that UMIAD-EGMF outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Specifically, on the BUSI dataset, the segmentation area under the precision-recall curve for object localization (AUPRO) of UMIAD-EGMF reaches 63.36%, surpassing that of the multi-scale low-level feature enhancement U-Net (MLFEU-net) by 0.01%; on the brain MRI dataset, its segmentation AUPRO is 90.83%, outperforming that of MLFEU-net by 0.33%; and on the head CT dataset, its segmentation AUPRO is 62.24%, exceeding that of MedMAE by 2.37%.

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionEdge guidanceMedical image analysisMulti-scale flow fusionUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID41766050
PMCPMC12950837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.