ArticleScientific reports2026
Influence of pore structure on grain bulk modulus of underground rock masses under hydro-mechanical conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an evaluation of the grain bulk modulus of rocks through experimental and theoretical methods. Unjacketed tests were performed on three rock types—Berea sandstone, Idaho sandstone, and Hwangdeung granite—to measure grain-scale compressibility. Theoretical estimates were obtained using mineral composition data and the Voigt–Reuss–Hill averaging method. To examine the role of pore structure, X-ray computed tomography (CT) was employed to visualize and quantify pore geometry, including isolated pores. Experimental results indicated material-dependent variation in grain bulk modulus not directly correlated with conventional mechanical properties. The theoretical values, as represented by the Hill average, were consistently higher than the experimental measurements, with overestimations of 7.2% for Berea sandstone, 37.3% for Idaho sandstone, and 31.7% for Hwangdeung granite. X-ray CT analysis confirmed that isolated pores contribute to additional volumetric deformation, which is unaccounted for in volume fraction-based models. A correlation between theoretical estimates and experimental values was derived to improve the applicability of the model. Conclusively, we present a systematic methodology for accurately evaluating grain bulk modulus by integrating experimental and theoretical approaches, offering foundational data and insight critical for geomechanical modeling in deep subsurface applications such as radioactive waste disposal or underground liquid hydrogen storage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.