ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Integrating cervical vertebral maturation and spheno-occipital synchondrosis on CT: a non-linear framework for probabilistic age estimation.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the developmental timing and variability of cervical vertebral maturation (C2–C4) and spheno-occipital synchondrosis (SOS) ossification, and to evaluate these indicators using non-linear growth modelling and probabilistic age-threshold analysis to improve transparent quantification of uncertainty at legally relevant age thresholds (≥ 14, ≥ 16, and ≥ 18 years). This retrospective cross-sectional study analysed CT examinations of 986 individuals aged 10–28 years. Cervical vertebral maturation (C2–C4) and SOS ossification were assessed using five-stage ordinal systems, with age treated as a continuous variable. Skeletal maturation was examined using descriptive analyses, transition analysis, non-linear Gompertz modelling, and probabilistic age-threshold estimation. Machine learning analyses were included for comparative purposes only. Cervical vertebral maturation progressed earlier and with less variability than SOS ossification, with complete fusion most frequently observed in C2, followed by C3 and C4. SOS showed prolonged and heterogeneous maturation with substantial overlap between advanced stages. Non-linear models demonstrated earlier inflection points for cervical vertebrae (approximately 15.8–16.6 years) than for SOS (approximately 18.9 years). Advanced cervical stages were associated with high probabilities of exceeding legal age thresholds, whereas complete SOS fusion alone showed lower discriminative value, particularly for ≥ 18 years. Combined assessment yielded the highest conditional probabilities and reduced uncertainty. Machine learning results were consistent with probabilistic modelling without providing additional biologically interpretable information. Cervical vertebral maturation and SOS ossification represent distinct but complementary aspects of skeletal development. Modelling these indicators as continuous, non-linear, and probabilistic processes enables explicit management of uncertainty and improves the forensic applicability of radiological age estimation, particularly near legally relevant age thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.