Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41766011›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Associations between political orientation and allyship: Evidence from potential allies and their LGBTQ+ close others.

Haley Bock, Jacqueline M Chen, Samantha Joel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haley BockDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. haley.bock@psych.utah.edu.
Jacqueline M ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Samantha JoelWestern University, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To support the LGBTQ+ community, many straight, cisgender individuals position themselves as allies to their cause. It is possible that those identifying as liberal may champion LGBTQ+ causes more passionately than those identifying as conservative, though it is also possible that liberals’ self-perceptions do not align with how LGBTQ+ individuals perceive them. In this study, we systematically investigated the relationship between political orientation and allyship to the LGBTQ+ community. We recruited 378 dyads composed of a cisgender, straight individual and an LGBTQ+ close other. Findings suggested that self-perceptions of allyship (from cisgender, straight individuals) were largely consistent with evaluations from LGBTQ+ close others. In line with our expectations, on average, liberals (compared to conservatives) both viewed themselves and were perceived as better allies. However, there was a small but significant tendency for liberals to overestimate their allyship relative to conservatives. In addition, exploratory analyses revealed other-perceived allyship was positively associated with higher interpersonal trust, underscoring allyship’s importance in close relationships. These findings contribute to a growing understanding of the ideological and interpersonal antecedents of allyship and inform strategies for fostering stronger, more authentic relationships with the LGBTQ+ community.The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 11/15/2024. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2Q7W6 .

Indexed as

PoliticsSexual and Gender MinoritiesFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleSelf ConceptSocial Group

Identifiers

PMID41766011
PMCPMC12988167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.