Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41765968›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

A prioritization framework for BRCA1/2 variants of uncertain significance identified by comprehensive genomic profiling.

Hikaru Nakahara, Hiroaki Niitsu, Asuka Toshida, Keisuke Goto, Masami Yamauchi, Khilola Madaminovna Saipova, C Nelson Hayes, Nobuyuki Hinata, Shiro Oka, Takao Hinoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reclassification ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Beyond the sequence.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hikaru NakaharaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroaki NiitsuDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan. hniitsu@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6878-9712
Asuka ToshidaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Keisuke GotoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Masami YamauchiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Khilola Madaminovna SaipovaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
C Nelson HayesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Nobuyuki HinataDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-6812
Shiro OkaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takao HinoiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has significantly advanced cancer genomics by enabling broad detection of clinically relevant genomic alterations across diverse cancers. In the context of BRCA1/2, CGP has expanded analysis beyond conventional testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), thereby identifying otherwise unrecognized variants. Nevertheless, the high prevalence of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) remains a major obstacle to clinical implementation. To address this challenge, we analyzed 2172 CGP tests performed at Hiroshima University Hospital and affiliated institutions in Japan. BRCA1/2 VUS identified through CGP were systematically prioritized using an integrative framework combining in silico prediction and functional evidence. From 526 BRCA1/2 variants, 153 were classified as VUS. Our variant prioritization filter based on ten in silico predictors narrowed these to 10 candidates, including two splice-site and eight missense variants, most of which were concordant with prior functional studies. Among these, the significance of BRCA2:c.67 G > C (p.D23H, NM_000059.4) had remained unclear. Functional analysis demonstrated exon 2 skipping consistent with loss of function, and clinical observations from two patients carrying this variant showed that therapeutic responses aligned with the biology of homologous recombination deficiency. These findings present a proof-of-concept framework for prioritizing and interpreting BRCA1/2 VUS detected in real-world CGP testing. By integrating multiple in silico predictors with functional evidence, this approach enables systematic prioritization and interpretation of BRCA1/2 VUS and may be broadly applicable to variant assessment in hereditary cancer predisposition genes.

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsGenetic TestingFemaleHumansOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID41765968
PMCPMC13424591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.