ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
A prioritization framework for BRCA1/2 variants of uncertain significance identified by comprehensive genomic profiling.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reclassification ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Beyond the sequence.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has significantly advanced cancer genomics by enabling broad detection of clinically relevant genomic alterations across diverse cancers. In the context of BRCA1/2, CGP has expanded analysis beyond conventional testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), thereby identifying otherwise unrecognized variants. Nevertheless, the high prevalence of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) remains a major obstacle to clinical implementation. To address this challenge, we analyzed 2172 CGP tests performed at Hiroshima University Hospital and affiliated institutions in Japan. BRCA1/2 VUS identified through CGP were systematically prioritized using an integrative framework combining in silico prediction and functional evidence. From 526 BRCA1/2 variants, 153 were classified as VUS. Our variant prioritization filter based on ten in silico predictors narrowed these to 10 candidates, including two splice-site and eight missense variants, most of which were concordant with prior functional studies. Among these, the significance of BRCA2:c.67 G > C (p.D23H, NM_000059.4) had remained unclear. Functional analysis demonstrated exon 2 skipping consistent with loss of function, and clinical observations from two patients carrying this variant showed that therapeutic responses aligned with the biology of homologous recombination deficiency. These findings present a proof-of-concept framework for prioritizing and interpreting BRCA1/2 VUS detected in real-world CGP testing. By integrating multiple in silico predictors with functional evidence, this approach enables systematic prioritization and interpretation of BRCA1/2 VUS and may be broadly applicable to variant assessment in hereditary cancer predisposition genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.