Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41765882›Full record

ArticleBMC proceedings2026

Rebuilding the foundation: recommendations from the Summit to Revitalize Primary Care (Rev PC).

Summit to Revitalize Primary Care Writing Committee*, Anthony Jerant, Richard L Kravitz, Joshua J Fenton, Courtney R Lyles, Kevin Grumbach, Mark C Henderson, Dominique Ritley, Margareta Brandt, Deborah Cohen and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC proceedings, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Summit to Revitalize Primary Care Writing Committee*
Anthony JerantDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA. afjerant@health.ucdavis.edu.
Richard L KravitzDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Joshua J FentonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Courtney R LylesUniversity of California Davis Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Kevin GrumbachDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mark C HendersonDivision of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Dominique RitleyUniversity of California Davis Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Margareta BrandtOffice of Health Care Affordability, California Department of Health Care Access and Information, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Deborah CohenDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, OR, USA.
Erik Fernandez Y GarciaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Kathryn E PhillipsCalifornia Health Care Foundation, Oakland, CA, USA.
Russell S PhillipsDivision of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Diane RittenhouseDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
S Monica SoniCovered California, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Lemeneh TeferaCalifornia Department of Health Care Access and Information, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Raymond TsaiPurchaser Business Group On Health, Concord, CA, USA.
Ilana YurkiewiczDivision of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2021, an ad hoc committee of the United States (U.S.) National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) affirmed that robust, relationship-centered primary care is the foundation of efficient, effective health care. Yet the ad hoc committee also noted primary care was "slowly dying," due to chronic under-investment, ill-suited payment models, and inadequate workforce planning and development. Encouragingly, efforts to revitalize primary care are underway. To accelerate this movement by generating expert consensus recommendations on the highest priority actions to take in repairing the frayed U.S. primary care base, clinical scientists at the University of California Davis (UCD) School of Medicine convened the Summit to Revitalize Primary Care (Rev PC). Summit recommendations were generated in four closed working sessions of a national Expert Committee. Committee members were selected to ensure a breadth of perspectives (e.g., health plans, purchasers of insurance, regulatory agencies, health systems, clinicians, educators, researchers, economists) from the public and private sectors. Seven high priority recommendations emerged: (1) Increase the proportion of spending on primary care, coupled with initiatives to slow the growth in total health care spending; (2) Pay for primary care using models that support high quality, team-based, relationship-centered, equitable care; (3) Assist practices in transformation to advanced primary care models and assess the impacts on clinical teams, patients, and communities; (4) Maximize primary care's potential to equitably advance health; (5) Advocate for training an appropriately large and diverse primary care physician workforce; (6) Expand research to address the most pressing issues in primary care; (7) Collaborate with a broad array of societal stakeholders in messaging the importance of robust primary care. These recommendations both overlap with and expand on those of the NASEM ad hoc committee and subsequent Standing Committee on Primary Care. Broad pursuit of the recommendations would catalyze sustained momentum toward appropriate primary care investment and workforce planning and development, enabling U.S. primary care to realize its yet-unfulfilled potential to improve population health and advance health equity while helping to control growth in total health care costs.

Indexed as

Continuity of patient careHealth care costsHealth care financingHealth equityHealth services researchPatient-centered carePhysician workforce planningPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID41765882
PMCPMC12951951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.