Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41765405›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2026

Fast MR Simulation Using Combined Update of Grouped Isochromats.

Hidenori Takeshima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hidenori TakeshimaAdvanced Technology Research Department, Research and Development Center, Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2557-8533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis work aims to overcome an assumption of conventional MR simulators: Individual isochromats should be simulated individually.

methodsTo reduce the computational times of MR simulation, a new simulation method using grouped isochromats is proposed. When multiple isochromats are grouped before simulations, some parts of the simulation can be shared in each group. For a certain gradient type, the isochromats in the group can be easily chosen for ensuring that they behave the same. For example, the group can be defined as the isochromats whose locations along x-axis, T1, T2 and magnetic field inhomogeneity values are the same values. In such groups, simulations can be combined when a pulse sequence with the magnetic field gradient along x-axis only are processed. The processing times of the conventional and proposed methods were evaluated with several sequences including echo-planar imaging (EPI) and spiral sequences.

resultsThe simulation times of the proposed method were 1.7 to 161 times faster than those of the conventional methods. In the cases of 2.3 billion isochromats using single instruction, multiple data (SIMD) instructions and multi-threading, the conventional method simulated the EPI and spiral sequences in 5526.7 and 15678.4 seconds, respectively. In the same cases, the proposed method simulated these sequences in 652.2 and 8046.2 seconds, respectively.

conclusionThe proposed method using grouped isochromats was efficient for reducing the computational times of the simulations.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsComputer SimulationEcho-Planar ImagingHumansTime FactorsBloch equationscombined transitionsgrouped isochromatsmagnetic resonance simulation

Identifiers

PMID41765405
PMCPMC13503010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.