ArticlePediatrics2026
GLP-1RA Dispensing in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes: 2020 to 2023.
Article in Pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are a novel pharmacotherapeutic option for pediatric type 2 diabetes (T2D); however, little is known about their current use. This study evaluated trends in GLP-1RA dispensing in youth with T2D between 2020 and 2023 and compared use by insurance type (ie, Medicaid vs commercial).
methodsWe conducted a multiyear cross-sectional study of youth aged 10 to 17 years with T2D using Merative™ MarketScan® Multi-State Medicaid and Commercial Database claims and encounters data (2020-2023). Annual prevalence of GLP-1RA dispensing was calculated for each year. Temporal trends in dispensing were examined using the Cochran-Armitage test. Poisson regression with robust variance estimated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) were used to evaluate associations between insurance type (ie, Medicaid vs commercial) and GLP-1RA dispensing in 2023.
resultsAnnual prevalence of GLP-1RA dispensing in youth with T2D increased from 10.9% in 2020 to 35.6% in 2023 (P value for trend < .001) but remained less frequent than long- (49.5%) and short-acting insulin (43.4%). In 2023, overall GLP-1RA dispensing was similar for Medicaid-insured and commercially insured youth; however, the types of GLP-1RA differed by insurance. Medicaid-insured youth were less likely than commercially insured youth to be dispensed semaglutide (aPR 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2-0.4) and more likely to be dispensed dulaglutide (aPR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2-2.0), exenatide (aPR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2-4.2), or liraglutide (aPR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.1).
conclusionsGLP-1RA dispensing increased in youth with T2D, but the type of GLP-1RA differed by insurance type. Comparative effectiveness studies and research identifying barriers to GLP-1RA use are needed to ensure optimal treatment of youth with T2D.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.