Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764961›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2026

Genomic and transcriptomic analyses revealed potential candidate genes for egg production traits in domesticated ducks.

Xinye Zhang, Xiurong Zhao, Hongchang Gu, Tao Zhu, Hongyan Sun, Yalan Zhang, Gang Wang, Xufang Ren, Anqi Chen, Xiaoyu Jiang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xinye ZhangDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing 100193, China.
Xiurong ZhaoDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing 100193, China.
Hongchang GuDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing 100193, China.
Tao ZhuDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing 100193, China.
Hongyan SunCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Yalan ZhangDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing 100193, China.
Gang WangDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing 100193, China.
Xufang RenDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing 100193, China.
Anqi ChenDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing 100193, China.
Xiaoyu JiangDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing 100193, China.
Lujiang QuDepartment of Animal Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan West Road 2#, Beijing 100193, China. Electronic address: quluj@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of domestication in ducks has led to distinct morphological, behavioral, and physiological traits that differentiate from their wild ancestors. Among these traits, reproductive performance, particularly egg production, has been specifically enhanced. In this study, in order to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the great differences of egg production between domesticated ducks and their wild ancestors, we integrated genomic and transcriptomic analyses to identify candidate genes and pathways associated with egg production. Selective sweep analyses based on Di revealed genomic regions under selection in multiple egg-type duck breeds. A total of 987 candidate genes were identified, with 11 genes shared across breeds, suggesting common selection pressures. Transcriptomic analyses between egg-type ducks and mallard revealed differentially expressed genes involved in hormone regulation, lipid transport, and follicular development in the liver and gonads. Multiple candidate genes (such as FN1, PDE10A, SEMA5B, UBE2E3) and enriched pathways (such as ECM-receptor interaction, Wnt signaling, steroid hormone biosynthesis) were found to be potentially linked to egg production traits. Notably, only FN1 and SEMA5B were identified by both genomic and transcriptomic analyses. Our study provide additional insights into the genetic basis of egg production in ducks.

Indexed as

DucksTranscriptomeAnimalsDomesticationFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsCandidate geneDuckEgg productionGenomeTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID41764961
PMCPMC12964289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.