ReviewJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2026
Extrafollicular and other non-germinal center B cell responses.
Review in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Developmental and Functional Implications of Age-Associated B Cells (ABCs) Across Tissue Microenvironments.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
B cells exist as different subsets shaped by developmental cues, the activation environment, and the magnitude and nature of immune stimulus; such heterogeneity is essential for tailored immune responses. From both mouse and human studies, the past decade has seen significant advances in our understanding of the wide variety of B cell activation pathways. However, the terms currently used to specify the type of B cell response have not kept up with this progress. Furthermore, a myopic focus on the germinal center (GC) response for the generation of protective or pathogenic antibodies has left other types of T cell-dependent but GC-independent antibody responses loosely categorized together as "extrafollicular (EF) responses" resulting in ambiguity with respect to cellular and molecular mechanisms. Based on the historical definition, an EF B cell response refers to an activation/differentiation path that is anatomically distinct from the GC and occurs outside of the B cell follicle. If anatomical location helps dictate functional outcomes, it is time to reconsider broad use of the term EF. Nomenclature is always imperfect, but a rethinking of current B cell nomenclature is warranted. Doing so could lead to a clearer understanding of different cellular pathways to humoral immunity and help reveal unanswered questions in B cell biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.