ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026
Quality of life surveys developed or validated in children or youth with special healthcare needs: a scoping review.
Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCurrent survey measures of quality of life (QoL) may not be sufficient to describe domains that are important to children and youth with special healthcare needs (CYSHCN) and their families. A better understanding of current QoL surveys for CYSHCN is needed.
methodsA scoping review of the literature was conducted utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy was developed and performed across multiple electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science) to identify studies published between 1/1/2000 and 2/27/2023. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts for inclusion, followed by full-text reviews with discrepancies resolved by a third party when necessary. Articles included focused on the development or validation of a measure of QoL in CYSHCN. Data extraction was performed to capture key information. Surveys were obtained when able for item review.
resultsOut of an initial 11,212 abstracts screened for inclusion, a final 305 articles were included. These articles represented 47 distinct surveys of QoL. Surveys were developed in a variety of health care conditions and available in multiple languages and forms. Of the 41 surveys available for item review, 61% (n = 25/41) included a domain of physical function as a key component of QoL.
conclusionA scoping review of measures of QoL in CYSHCN identified a large volume of literature incorporating 47 unique surveys. However, few surveys considered CYSHCN directly in their initial development and validation, leading to concerns about the ability of these surveys to accurately assess QoL in CYSHCN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41764674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.