ArticleBMC psychology2026
Development and validation of the engaging in life scale: long and short forms among Chinese adults with emotional distress.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Engaging in life has been proposed as a potential transdiagnostic mechanism underlying emotional disorders, underscoring the need for reliable assessment. This study conducted a multi-stage development and validation of the Engaging in Life Scale (ELS). Participants were 2,420 Chinese adults aged 18–65 recruited from the prescreening phase of a randomized controlled trial on emotional distress, ensuring inclusion of individuals with varying symptom levels. An initial item pool was generated through qualitative interviews and expert review, then refined via item analysis and exploratory factor analysis, yielding a 17-item scale (ELS-17) encompassing four dimensions—work/study, socializing, leisure, and sleep routine. Confirmatory factor analysis in an independent subsample supported this four-factor structure, with high reliability (α = 0.83–0.91) and satisfactory construct validity (CR = 0.87–0.93; AVE = 0.64–0.78). Multidimensional item response theory indicated strong measurement precision and measurement invariance across gender, age, and distress severity. To enhance applicability, a short form (ELS-8) was derived using the ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm, retaining two items per dimension while preserving model fit, reliability, and criterion validity. The ELS-8 showed excellent fit and very high correspondence with the ELS-17 (r = 0.98). Overall, the ELS provides a theoretically grounded and psychometrically sound measure of engaging in life in both long and short forms, offering a solid foundation for future research on transdiagnostic mechanisms underlying emotional disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.