ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026
Deep learning prediction model based on multi-modal transvaginal ultrasound scan images for endometrial cancer.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUltrasound-based deep learning (DL) models for the precise diagnosis of endometrial cancer are insufficient. Our aim is to develop and validate an automatic multi-modal ultrasound DL prediction model for the accurate identification of benign versus malignant endometrial diseases.
methodsThe retrospective dataset of patients with endometrial diseases from two hospitals was segregated into an internal set (n = 696) and an external set (n = 78). All patients underwent grayscale, color Doppler, and 3D reconstructed ultrasound scans. We established ResNet-18 DL models using individual sequences (DLgray, DLCDFI, DL3D) and multi-modal sequences (DLfusion), with comparative performance evaluation through area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. We compared the best-performing model with 12 radiologists and assessed the diagnostic performance of radiologists with model assistance.
resultsThe DLfusion model exhibits precise discrimination capabilities for benign and malignant endometrial diseases, achieving an AUC of 0.92. This performance significantly surpasses that of DLgray (0.78, p < 0.01), DLCDFI (0.79, p = 0.01), and assessments by radiologists (0.64, p < 0.001). The DLfusion model is more accurate than radiologists (0.86 vs. 0.78, p < 0.001) at detecting endometrial cancer. With the assistance of the DLfusion model, the average diagnostic accuracy of twelve radiologists significantly improves from 0.77 to 0.85 (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe DLfusion model based on multi-modal ultrasonic images exhibits a better capacity in diagnosing endometrial cancer compared with radiologists and DL models based on single modal, and significantly improves the diagnostic accuracy of radiologists, offering valuable support for clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.