ArticleGenome biology2026
Decoding exon inclusion in the human brain reveals more divergent splicing mechanisms in neurons than glia.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlternative splicing contributes to molecular diversity across brain cell types. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate splicing, but the genome-wide mechanisms underlying cell-type-specific splicing remain poorly understood.
resultsHere, we want to unravel cell-type-specific splicing mechanisms by using RBP binding sites and/or the genomic sequence to predict exon inclusion in neurons and glia as measured by long-read single-cell data in the human hippocampus and frontal cortex. We found that exon inclusion of variable exons is harder to predict in neurons compared to glia in both brain regions. Comparing neurons and glia, the position of RBP binding sites in alternatively spliced exons in neurons differ more from non-variable exons indicating distinct splicing mechanisms. Model interpretation pinpointed RBPs, including QKI, potentially regulating alternative splicing between neurons and glia. Finally, we accurately predict and prioritize the effect of splicing QTLs.
conclusionsOur results indicate that the splicing mechanisms in variable exons in neurons diverged more from the standard mechanisms. Splicing in neurons might be less sequence-dependent and influenced more by, for instance, chromatin accessibility or methylation. Taken together, these results highlight new insights into the mechanisms regulating cell-type-specific alternative splicing in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.