ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in a middle-income country: feasibility and learning curve in a low-volume center.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prior minimally invasive experience and the robotic mitral valve learning curve: a focused narrative review and the tactile-visual decoupling hypothesis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMinimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIM-VS) has emerged as a safe alternative to conventional median sternotomy (MS), offering advantages such as faster recovery and improved cosmetic results. However, evidence regarding its implementation and learning curve in low-volume centers within middle-income countries remains limited. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of MIM-VS and MS in a low-volume center in Colombia and to assess the institutional learning curve. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective study was conducted on 112 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery via MIM-VS (n = 63) or MS (n = 49) between 2015 and mid-2024. A 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching algorithm without replacement was used to minimize confounding variables. Early postoperative outcomes were compared, and the learning curve for MIM-VS was assessed using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.
resultsAfter matching, outcomes were comparable between groups. MIM-VS was associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass (125.0 vs. 77.0 min; p < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp times (93.0 vs. 59.0 min; p < 0.001). However, patients in the MIM-VS group exhibited shorter ICU stays (1.0–3.0 vs. 2.0–3.0 days; p = 0.045). Complication rates, including mortality, paravalvular leak, and femoral vessel injury, were similar between groups. CUSUM analysis showed an initial learning phase characterized by variable operative times, which stabilized after 40 cases. Proficiency was reached after 50 cases, correlating with reduced operative times and better outcomes. Success and failure rates improved, stabilizing after case 23, reinforcing the need for structured training and experience.
conclusionThe implementation of MIM-VS in a low-volume center in a middle-income country is feasible, safe and non-inferior to MS. Although initially associated with prolonged operative times, procedural efficiency improves with experience without compromising patient safety. These findings support the structured adoption of minimally invasive techniques in similar resource-constrained settings committed to training and quality monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.