ArticleBMC health services research2026
Bridging the gap: a multimethod study protocol for developing and validating a media health literacy framework in the Iranian health system.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedia Health Literacy (MHL) is essential for individuals to access, evaluate, and apply health information from diverse media sources, particularly in the digital era, where misinformation is prevalent. While its global significance is widely recognized, many health systems—particularly in low- and middle-income settings—lack structured, evidence-informed frameworks tailored to their specific sociocultural and policy environments. Bridging this gap is essential to strengthen public health communication, promote informed decision-making, and counteract the spread of health misinformation. This protocol outlines a multimethod approach to developing and validating a context-specific MHL framework within the Iranian health system, which may serve as a model for similar contexts worldwide.
methodsThis study will use a multimethod research design and is structured into four phases. In the first phase, a conventional content analysis qualitative study, including focus group discussions and also in-depth interviews with the general public and semi-structured interviews with experts will be conducted to exploring experiences and perspectives of different stakeholders on framework requirements for MHL in Iran’s health system. In the second Phase a scoping review will be carried to identifying key components of MHL frameworks globally and their challenges in implementation. In the third phase an initial MHL theoretical framework, will be designed from integrating findings Phases 1 and 2, with input from an expert panel of health education and healthcare professionals. Finally at fourth phase this framework will be validated using the Delphi technique, where experts will assess the framework’s feasibility and scientific credibility. DISCUSSION: This study amies to develop a culturally tailored MHL framework for the Iranian health system. Its implementation is expected to strengthen health decision-making and reduce misinformation, particularly in vulnerable populations. Although context-specific, the framework’s modular design and methodological transparency support its adaptation in other low- and middle-income countries. The study’s participatory approach enhances relevance, while its contribution to global health literacy research offers broader implications for policy and system-level interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.