ArticleConflict and health2026
Supporting teachers in a war zone: a mixed methods study of a brief intervention in the context of ongoing war.
Article in Conflict and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Teaching Under Fire: A Cross-Sectional Study of Dispositional and Life-Stage Correlates of Perceived Resilience Among Israeli Educators Under Missile Threat.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the ongoing war in Gaza, teachers face a dual burden as caregivers supporting traumatized children and as community members exposed to the same violence and trauma. Teachers are therefore at high risk for burnout and supporting teachers' well-being is critical during war. In the context of extreme stress and crisis, supporting those who deliver psychosocial support to children is essential. This paper presents the development, implementation and piloting of an intervention to improve teachers' psychological well-being self-care during war.
methodsA bottom-up approach was used to assess the needs and difficulties of Gazan teachers using "listening sessions," and a group intervention was co-developed in collaboration with those living and working in the war zone. A mixed-methods design was employed for the pilot study, utilizing quantitative data from a pre- and post-assessment tool completed by teachers in Gaza (n = 33) and in the West Bank (n = 24), alongside qualitative data from listening sessions with teachers, steering committee meetings, and field notes.
resultsListening sessions revealed that Gazan teachers felt overwhelmed by intense and ongoing traumatic events and loss alongside significant ongoing external stressors. Based on these findings, a 3-session intervention focusing on self-care and peer support was developed and piloted. Quantitative data showed significant pre-post improvements in well-being (t(48) = 7.48), coping skills (t(48) = 7.13), and sense of meaning t(49) = 3.56), while qualitative findings highlighted increased cognitive flexibility and focus through social support, new awareness and insights, and coping strategies.
conclusionsThis brief and feasible support intervention for teachers showed significant very positive effects on their subjective sense of well-being and coping in the midst of war stressors. It is expected that the teachers' improved coping during wartime will also increase their ability to positively interact with the stressed and traumatized children they support in educational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.