Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764480›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

Predicting adverse prognostic outcomes in hospitalized breast cancer patients: development and validation of a risk model.

Liya Ma, Endi Cai, Zhiyuan Zhou, Mengchun Gong, Chen Li

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liya MaSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China.
Endi CaiDigital Health China Technologies Co., LTD, Floor 19, China Technology Exchange Building, 66 West Beisihuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Zhiyuan ZhouNingxia Medical University General Hospital, Ningxia, 750004, China.
Mengchun GongDigital Health China Technologies Co., LTD, Floor 19, China Technology Exchange Building, 66 West Beisihuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Chen LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710049, China. cli@xjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

Science and Technology Department of Ningxia Province Key Technologies and Applications of Medical Big Data Management in Major Chronic Diseases (2022BEG02025)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer prognosis is influenced by diverse clinical factors, necessitating advanced predictive tools for personalized treatment. This study developed machine learning models to predict adverse outcomes in breast cancer patients using comprehensive clinical data.

methodsWe analyzed data from 4,242 patients (3,836 with stable progression and 406 with adverse outcomes) at a single institution. Feature selection via univariate/multivariate analysis and machine learning importance ranking identified 10 key predictors, including metastasis stage, hospitalization duration, total healthcare costs, and laboratory test results. Ten machine learning models were evaluated using 1:1, 1:2, and 1:3 undersampling ratios to address class imbalance. Performance was assessed via accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, the area under the curve (AUC), and precision.

resultsThe Random Forest (RF) model achieved an optimal balance with 88.69% accuracy, 0.733 sensitivity, and 0.952 specificity (AUC range: 0.881–0.898) across sampling ratios, demonstrating superior class separation.SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis revealed metastasis (SHAP = + 6.0) as the strongest risk factor, while marital status and Luminal A subtype were protective. Logistic Regression(LR) also performed robustly (AUC > 0.88), excelling in specificity (0.950 under 1:3 undersampling).

conclusionMachine learning models, particularly RF and LR, effectively predicted prognosis by integrating clinical and laboratory features. RF’s stability in imbalanced data and interpretability via SHAP enhanced clinical utility. Future multi-center studies should validate these findings and explore causal mechanisms. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHospitalizationMachine LearningAdultAgedClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestRisk AssessmentBreast cancer prognosisData imbalanceLogistic regressionMachine learningRandom forestSHapley Additive exPlanations

Identifiers

PMID41764480
PMCPMC13020269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.