ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Explainable deep learning and radiomics integration for differentiating insulinomas from NF-PNETs in EUS imaging.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Endoscopic Ultrasonography: From Image-Based Diagnosis to Cytopathology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop interpretable deep learning (DL) and radiomics models using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images to differentiate insulinomas from nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs).
methodsThe retrospective analysis comprised 115 patients, including 61 with insulinomas and 54 with NF-PNETs, all confirmed through pathological examination. The patient cohort was divided into training and test groups. From standardized EUS images, a total of 512 DL features and 107 radiomics features were extracted. LASSO regression was employed to identify non-zero coefficient features from both the DL and radiomics datasets. Subsequently, four machine learning algorithms were utilized to construct predictive models. The optimal DL and radiomics models were then integrated into a nomogram for enhanced predictive capability. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) provided model interpretability.
resultsThe ExtraTrees DL and radiomics models demonstrated exceptional performance. The integrated nomogram yielded AUC values of 0.978 for the training group and 0.842 for the test group. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis corroborated the high accuracy and clinical utility of the models. Grad-CAM identified tumor margins and heterogeneity as significant features in the DL model, whereas SHAP analysis highlighted texture patterns in the radiomics data. The nomogram effectively facilitated visual simplification of risk stratification.
conclusionsThe interpretable DL-radiomics nomogram exhibited significant potential in differentiating insulinomas from NF-PNETs using EUS. This methodology improves diagnostic accuracy and informs clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.