ArticleBMC cancer2026
Expanding the RB1 variant landscape of heritable retinoblastoma: unlocking precision oncology potential in Southern Africa.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetinoblastoma (Rb) is the most common childhood intraocular cancer, with heritable forms caused by pathogenic germline variants in the RB1 (or retinoblastoma 1) gene, which necessitate intensive and costly lifelong surveillance. Genetic testing enables precise risk prediction and individualized clinical management, yet data on the RB1 variant spectrum in African populations remains scarce. This study investigated the molecular landscape of clinically presumed heritable Rb in a Southern African cohort and evaluated the potential healthcare and economic benefits of implementing genetic testing.
methodsFifty-eight patients with clinically presumed heritable Rb were recruited from two tertiary hospitals in South Africa. Comprehensive RB1 gene analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect single nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions and deletions (indels), and copy number variants (CNVs), and was supplemented by methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA). A cost comparison model was developed to evaluate conventional clinical screening versus a genetically guided approach.
resultsRB1 pathogenic and/or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 84.5% (49/58) of patients, including eleven novel variants. The variant spectrum included frameshift, nonsense, splicing, intronic, and missense changes, with a notable concentration in the pocket domain region of the Rb associated protein (pRb). CNVs were detected in 10.3% of probands. Our cost analysis demonstrated significant savings associated with genetic testing, reducing surveillance-related expenses by up to US$228,989 across extended family generations in the private sector and US$166,489 in the public sector. Implementing genetic testing would also minimize unnecessary examinations and promote more efficient allocation of healthcare resources.
conclusionsComprehensive RB1 genetic testing in this Southern African cohort revealed a diverse variant landscape, including novel pathogenic changes, and demonstrated the clinical and economic value of integrating genetic testing into Rb management. These findings contribute to the global understanding of genetic variation within the RB1 gene and support tailored care strategies that can reduce the surveillance burden, optimize healthcare resources, and improve outcomes for affected families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.