Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764457›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Expanding the RB1 variant landscape of heritable retinoblastoma: unlocking precision oncology potential in Southern Africa.

Indiana van Rensburg, Hamzah Mustak, Gameda Benefeld, Lucy Cunnama, Helga Abrahamse-Pillay, Raj Ramesar, Lisa Roberts

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Indiana van RensburgUCT/MRC Genomic and Precision Medicine Research Unit, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Hamzah MustakDivision of Ophthalmology, Groote Schuur Hospital and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Gameda BenefeldUCT/MRC Genomic and Precision Medicine Research Unit, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lucy CunnamaHealth Economics Unit and Division, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Helga Abrahamse-PillayDivision of Ophthalmology, Tygerberg Hospital and Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Raj RamesarUCT/MRC Genomic and Precision Medicine Research Unit, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lisa RobertsUCT/MRC Genomic and Precision Medicine Research Unit, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. lisa.roberts@uct.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinoblastoma (Rb) is the most common childhood intraocular cancer, with heritable forms caused by pathogenic germline variants in the RB1 (or retinoblastoma 1) gene, which necessitate intensive and costly lifelong surveillance. Genetic testing enables precise risk prediction and individualized clinical management, yet data on the RB1 variant spectrum in African populations remains scarce. This study investigated the molecular landscape of clinically presumed heritable Rb in a Southern African cohort and evaluated the potential healthcare and economic benefits of implementing genetic testing.

methodsFifty-eight patients with clinically presumed heritable Rb were recruited from two tertiary hospitals in South Africa. Comprehensive RB1 gene analysis was performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect single nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions and deletions (indels), and copy number variants (CNVs), and was supplemented by methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA). A cost comparison model was developed to evaluate conventional clinical screening versus a genetically guided approach.

resultsRB1 pathogenic and/or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 84.5% (49/58) of patients, including eleven novel variants. The variant spectrum included frameshift, nonsense, splicing, intronic, and missense changes, with a notable concentration in the pocket domain region of the Rb associated protein (pRb). CNVs were detected in 10.3% of probands. Our cost analysis demonstrated significant savings associated with genetic testing, reducing surveillance-related expenses by up to US$228,989 across extended family generations in the private sector and US$166,489 in the public sector. Implementing genetic testing would also minimize unnecessary examinations and promote more efficient allocation of healthcare resources.

conclusionsComprehensive RB1 genetic testing in this Southern African cohort revealed a diverse variant landscape, including novel pathogenic changes, and demonstrated the clinical and economic value of integrating genetic testing into Rb management. These findings contribute to the global understanding of genetic variation within the RB1 gene and support tailored care strategies that can reduce the surveillance burden, optimize healthcare resources, and improve outcomes for affected families.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingRetinal NeoplasmsRetinoblastomaRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesAfrica, SouthernChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansINDEL MutationRB1 protein, humanRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesCancer geneticsCopy number variant analysisHealth economicsMolecular diagnosisNext-generation sequencingRetinoblastoma

Identifiers

PMID41764457
PMCPMC12983656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.