Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764454›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2026

Why aggregated data falls short: an exploratory survey study on barriers and facilitators in implementing the stepped care model for mental health in primary care.

Anders Brantnell, Svea Fredriksson, Amanda Simonsson, Klas Palm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anders BrantnellDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Industrial Engineering and Management, Uppsala University, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Ångströmlaboratoriet, Uppsala, 752 37, Sweden. anders.brantnell@angstrom.uu.se.
Svea FredrikssonDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Industrial Engineering and Management, Uppsala University, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Ångströmlaboratoriet, Uppsala, 752 37, Sweden.
Amanda SimonssonDepartment of Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Uppsala University, von Kramers allé 1A och 1C, Uppsala, 752 37, Sweden.
Klas PalmDepartment of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Industrial Engineering and Management, Uppsala University, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Ångströmlaboratoriet, Uppsala, 752 37, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementing the stepped care model for mental health in primary care organizations is a complex process influenced by various barriers and facilitators. Identifying these barriers and facilitators at the appropriate level is crucial for developing effective implementation strategies. Traditionally, barriers and facilitators are identified at the aggregate level, which may not be optimal due to potential organizational and professional differences. The objectives of this study were to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing the stepped care model across three primary care organizations in Sweden and to explore differences in barriers and facilitators at the aggregate, organizational, and professional levels.

methodsAn online self-report survey was conducted between January and May 2023 among healthcare professionals (n = 33) in three Swedish primary care organizations implementing the stepped care model for mental health. The survey included two open-ended questions regarding barriers and facilitators. Summative content analysis was used to identify frequent barriers and facilitators at the aggregate, organizational, and professional levels. Given the small sample size and early stage of implementation, the study was designed as an exploratory study.

resultsThe findings revealed seven frequent barriers and facilitators to implementation: benefits of the model, information and communication, knowledge of the model, propensity to change, resources, support from management and time to work with implementation. At the aggregate level, two barriers (e.g., time to work on implementation) and five facilitators (e.g., resources) were prevalent. At the organizational level, some frequent barriers and facilitators corresponded with those identified at the aggregate level, but there were notable differences between the three organizations. At the professional level, some similarities were observed among psychologists, but no consistent trends were found across other professions.

conclusionsThe study provides three novel contributions to stepped-care implementation research. First, organizational-level analysis reveals context-specific barriers and facilitators that aggregated data overlook, making the organizational level the most informative for guiding implementation. Second, the time required to work on implementation emerges as a distinct barrier. Third, resources function not only as barriers when lacking but also as facilitators when available.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesPrimary Health CareAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenbarriersfacilitatorshealthcare professionalsimplementationmental healthprimary carestepped care model

Identifiers

PMID41764454
PMCPMC13064063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.