ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Calibrating limitation features and dependence levels in basic activities of daily living among individuals with dementia: an item response theory-based analysis.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvaluating basic activities of daily living (BADL) is essential for monitoring disease progression and determining appropriate care plans for individuals with dementia. Existing dementia-specific BADL scales emphasize specific limitations without adequately depicting the spectrum of dependence. Discrepancies in how these limitations and the required assistance are described and interpreted across scales highlight the urgent need for a standardized approach to accurately map limitation features to their appropriate levels of dependence.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study. Participants with dementia were enrolled between May and September 2022 from a 274-bed dementia unit at a nursing home in Guangzhou, China. Limitation features were classified into eight categories from “no limitations” to “resistance to care”. Dependence was rated on an 11-point scale, from complete independence (0) to complete dependence (10). The calibration of limitation features and dependence levels was based on item response theory (IRT) analysis.
resultsIn total, 215 subjects were included (mean age 85.2 ± 7.4; 70.7% female). Hierarchically, the average measures (logit) increased from “no limitations” (-3.6 to -1.8), “initiation deficits” (-2.7 to -0.6), “planning deficits” (-2.2 to 0), “organizational deficits” (-1.6 to 0.4), “partial execution deficits” (-1.2 to 0.8), “inability with cooperation” (0.3 to 1.3), to “complete inability” (1.4 to 2.1). IRT location parameters revealed that deficits in initiation, planning, and organization fell within mild dependence (average θ: -1.1 to 0) across most of the items, although organizational deficits in grooming aligned more closely with moderate dependence. Partial execution deficits and inability with cooperation corresponded to moderate (average θ: -0.4 to 0.5) and severe dependence (average θ: 0.3 to 0.8), respectively. “Resistance to care” was disordered and fell between “inability with cooperation” and “complete inability”. The item characteristic curves supported these mappings.
conclusionsThe findings offer valuable insights into the hierarchical nature of dementia-specific BADL limitations and gradation of dependence in BADL of persons with dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.