ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Suicide risk, protective factors, and interventions for young people in out-of-home care: a scoping review.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionYoung people in out-of-home care (OOHC) experience disproportionately high rates of suicide and self-harm, yet suicide prevention remains underdeveloped within child protection systems. This scoping review synthesises international peer-reviewed literature and relevant Australian gray literature from the past decade to identify risk factors, protective factors, and interventions associated with suicidality among care-experienced young people.
methodsThis review was guided by the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and followed Arksey and O'Malley's five-step framework. With the support of a research librarian, a search strategy was developed to capture both peer-reviewed and gray literature. Four electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ProQuest) were searched via carefully selected keywords, covering publications from 2014 to February 2025.
resultsSeventeen studies met the inclusion criteria and spanned diverse methodologies and geographic contexts. The key risk factors included a history of trauma, placement instability, mental health comorbidities, and systemic failure in OOHC. Protective factors centred on relational safety, emotional regulation, and culturally affirming support. Interventions ranged from high-intensity therapeutic models to low-intensity relational programs, with promising outcomes linked to caregiver connection and trauma-informed practice.
conclusionThe findings demonstrate the need for gender-sensitive, relationally driven approaches and more robust multi-item assessment tools. This review highlights critical gaps in young people's voice inclusion and calls for codesigned interventions with care-experienced young people. The implications for policy and practice include strengthening professional development for carers and adapting existing suicide prevention frameworks to the OOHC context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.