ArticleBMC genomics2026
Selection index for genetic improvement of beef performance in Huaxi cattle of Xinjiang, China.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuaxi cattle are a local breed in Xinjiang, China. This breed has gained increasing attention from farmers and breeders for its dual-purpose capabilities in both meat and dairy production. Beyond this, these animals are highly adapted to extreme environmental conditions, making them unique and valuable for livestock-enhancing programs and the food industry. To maximize economic potential, effective selection strategies should be designed to enhance production (milk and meat) and identify individuals with superior genetics, as assessed by Estimated Breeding Values (EBVs). Therefore, the current study aimed to construct selection indices for 12-month body weight (WEI-12) as a primary objective and daily milk yield (DMY) using the Smith-Hazel index method in Huaxi cattle reared in Xinjiang, China–an area that has not previously been studied.
methodsBased on estimated genetic parameters, including heritability, genetic and phenotypic variances, and covariances for the WEI-12 and DMY traits in Huaxi cattle, a selection index was calculated using the classical Smith-Hazel method. The mathematical model was fitted in RStudio (version 4.5.2, 2026) using the dplyr, tidyr, and readxl packages.
resultsNine indices (C1 to C9) were constructed by applying varying conditions, including adjustments to economic weights, selection intensity, genetic correlation, and heritability, to identify the most effective index and assess its sensitivity to selection. Among the nine indices, C1, C2, C7, C8, and C9 exhibited the highest expected genetic gains of 2.723, 2.703, 2.7152, 2.6543, and 2.9049, respectively–along with accuracy rates of 0.19, 0.18, 0.18, 0.18, and 0.19, respectively. These indices demonstrated positive genetic gain potential for WEI-12 and DMY traits under ideal conditions (e.g., high selection intensity of 10% and the original estimated genetic parameters). Furthermore, minor alterations to these ideal conditions, specifically in genetic parameters, resulted in a negligible impact on the index ’s performance. Notably, small changes were observed when genetic correlation and heritability were modified by + 10% and –20%, respectively, suggesting the index’s robustness.
conclusionThe present research established a theoretical framework utilizing pedigree based estimated genetic parameters for the construction of selection indices to increase genetic gain in 12-month body weight (primary goal) and daily milk production. This approach could be utilized by breeders in developing sustainable and productive breeding plans for Huaxi cattle. The results highlight the importance of incorporating economically relevant traits and genomic information (e.g., gBLUP) to enhance the accuracy and sustainability of breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.