SynthesisBMC public health2026
Medical waste disposal practices and their health consequences in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSafe healthcare waste (HCW) management is critical for environmental and public health. In resource-limited settings (RLS), expanding healthcare services have increased medical waste, but systems for safe disposal are often lacking.
methodsA comprehensive search of studies published between January 2018 and September 2023 was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Global Index Medicus. Included studies were observational studies examining HCW practices and related health outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened studies, assessed quality using Joanna Briggs Institute tools, and extracted data. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and prevalence estimates, with heterogeneity quantified using I² statistics.
resultsOf 5,872 records, 94 studies met inclusion criteria. Inadequate waste segregation had a pooled prevalence of 68.4% (95% CI: 61.2–75.1%, I² = 96.5%). Open dumping or uncontrolled burning was the most common disposal method (57.1%, 95% CI: 48.9–65.0%). Healthcare workers in facilities with poor waste management had 4.31 times higher odds of needle-stick injuries (95% CI: 3.02–6.15) and 3.45 times higher odds of Hepatitis B infection (95% CI: 2.10–5.68) compared to controls. Limited community-level data (n = 5, exploratory) showed increased respiratory infections and diarrhea in children living near poorly managed HCW sites.
conclusionThis study provides comprehensive quantitative evidence that systematic failures in HCW disposal in RLS are directly associated with significant, preventable health risks. The findings underscore an urgent need for targeted interventions including capacity building, resource investment, policy enforcement, and affordable, context-specific technologies to reduce the disease burden linked to unsafe HCW management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.