Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764415›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

From Dismissal to Partnership: Patient Experiences of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection Healthcare Informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Theory.

Abigail F Newlands, Melissa L Kramer, Sarah Snuggs, Katherine A Finlay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Women's Experiences of Recurrent UTIs: A Qualitative Study of Preventive Management and Decision Support Needs.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abigail F NewlandsSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4718-0075
Melissa L KramerSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9242-5203
Sarah SnuggsSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5191-9517
Katherine A FinlaySchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8997-2652

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI) is common, debilitating, and associated with substantial negative impact on quality of life. Despite this, rUTI healthcare is often experienced as fragmented, dismissive, and poorly aligned with patient needs. Applying behavioural science theory to systematically identify modifiable intervention targets offers a promising but unexplored approach to improving rUTI care.

objectiveTo explore patient experiences of rUTI healthcare in the United Kingdom, identify barriers to and facilitators of quality care, and generate theory-informed targets for behaviour-change intervention and service improvement.

designQualitative interview study using reflexive thematic analysis, followed by deductive mapping of themes to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy (BCTT), and Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology (BCIO). SETTING AND

participantsSemi-structured one-to-one interviews with 26 adults living with rUTI in the United Kingdom, with the interview schedule informed by the TDF.

resultsFour barrier themes revealed systematic challenges: 'Struggling with the System,' 'Unheard Voices,' 'Shouldering Blame' and 'Forced to Become an Expert.' Together, these captured how diagnostic limitations, fragmented services, clinical dismissal, and individualised blame compel people living with rUTI into self-advocacy experienced as exhausting. Four facilitator themes demonstrated that quality care is achievable: 'Feeling Validated,' 'Partners in the Puzzle,' 'Continuity and Connection' and 'Expanding the Toolkit.' All 14 TDF domains were implicated, most frequently 'social influences,' 'beliefs about consequences,' 'environmental context and resources' and 'knowledge,' indicating improvement requires both system restructuring and interpersonal skill development. Mapping to the BCTT and BCIO identified specific intervention techniques targeting these domains.

conclusionPeople living with rUTI face structural and relational challenges in healthcare that compound illness burden. When individuals feel believed, involved, and supported, rUTI healthcare experiences are transformed. By integrating reflexive thematic analysis with behavioural theory, this study demonstrates that improving rUTI care requires attention to both system-level factors such as diagnostic flexibility, service continuity, and treatment options, alongside relational factors, particularly validation and shared decision-making. These findings provide a theoretically grounded foundation for intervention development, with broader relevance for chronic conditions characterised by diagnostic uncertainty.

Indexed as

Urinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareQuality of LifeRecurrenceUnited Kingdombehaviour changehealthcare qualitypatient‐doctor communicationpatient experiencequalitativerecurrent urinary tract infectionshared decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID41764415
PMCPMC12949963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.