ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-objective sizing and location of DG in distribution network by hybrid gorilla troops optimization-genetic algorithm: a real case study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficient incorporation of distributed generators optimal DG in distribution networks represents a fundamental strategy for ensuring economical and efficient power system operation. The optimal DG problem can be described as a Mixed Discrete-Continuous Optimization Problem (MDCOP). In this study, a new hybrid approach combining Gorilla Troops Optimization and Genetic Algorithm, namely the Hybrid GTO-GA, is proposed. The proposed hybrid is utilized to decide the optimal sizing and location of DG units in distribution networks to reduce power losses and ameliorate the voltage profile, either individually (i.e., single-objective) or simultaneously (i.e., multi-objective). The effectiveness of the suggested hybrid GTO-GA approach is examined using 23 test functions and applied to two practical test systems of different sizes: the IEEE 33-bus distribution system and a real 143-bus system. The simulation findings display that the hybrid GTO-GA approach ensures better convergence and improved exploration of the search space compared to standalone GTO and GA algorithms. It has also proven effective in significantly reducing economic losses by minimizing power loss and voltage deviation. In the IEEE 33-bus system, yearly economic losses decreased from 91,988.14 $ to 13,773.960 $, resulting in savings of 78,214.18 $. Similarly, in the real143-bus system, losses were reduced from 177,898.08 $ to 32,401.56 $, yielding savings of 145,496.52 $.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.