Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764348›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Predicting FOX gene candidates for oxic nitrogen fixation using multi-omic machine learning and comparative bioinformatics.

James Young, Liping Gu, Ruanbao Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James YoungDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Liping GuDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA.
Ruanbao ZhouDepartment of Biology and Microbiology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA. Ruanbao.Zhou@sdstate.edu.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2416911South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station-USDA Hatch project SD00H833-25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen fixation in oxygenic cyanobacteria depends on a system of genes that protect oxygen-sensitive nitrogenase, many of which likely remain uncharacterized. Here we predict FOX (fixation in the presence of oxygen) gene candidates in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 by integrating nitrogen step-down RNA-seq (0/6/12/21 hours), quantitative proteomics, promoter architecture, genomic context, and reciprocal-best-hit conservation across diazotrophic and non-diazotrophic cyanobacteria. Using 68 literature-validated FOX genes and 835 conserved non-essential genes as a proxy negative class, we trained logistic regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost models and evaluated them using 20 repeated stratified 80/20 train–test splits. The best models achieved ROC–AUC up to 0.80 and average precision up to 0.55 and precision among the top 20 ranked genes reached 0.39 versus a 0.075 prevalence baseline. Model interpretation highlights late step-down induction, diazotroph-biased conservation, and genomic neighborhood signals as leading predictors. We generated genome-wide FOX probability scores used primarily for candidate ranking, nominating conserved genes spanning heterocyst envelope processes as well as broader redox, metabolism, and electron-pool regulation. We release these predictions and a public web-based optimizer that applies comparative-bioinformatics filters and size constraints to propose candidate accessory-gene complements for experimental testing and heterologous reconstitution efforts.

Indexed as

AnabaenaBacterial ProteinsComputational BiologyMachine LearningNitrogen FixationBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsOxygenProteomicsBacterial ProteinsOxygencomparative bioinformaticscyanobacteriaFOX genesmachine learningnitrogen fixationsynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID41764348
PMCPMC13056922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.