ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable LSTM-AdamW based fault diagnosis of aircraft rotating components using airborne acoustic signals under dynamic operating conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-session, multi-device acoustic dataset for progressive tool degradation monitoring.Data in brief · 2026Article
- A hybrid CNN-LSTM approach for large-scale Twitter sentiment analysis with explainable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning models for smart grid stability prediction: a comparative analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A lightweight CNN-transformer hybrid architecture with channel attention for real-time hazardous acoustic event detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Enhanced deep learning networks integrated by fractals for air quality index analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acoustic signal (AS) has emerged as a powerful non-contact technique for early detection of incipient faults in aircraft rotating components due to its high sensitivity to transient damage mechanisms. However, the strong non-stationarity and noise susceptibility of acoustic signals under dynamically varying operating conditions present significant challenges for reliable fault diagnosis. In this study, an explainable deep learning framework based on a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network optimized with the AdamW algorithm is proposed for fault diagnosis of aircraft-related rotating components using acoustic signals. The framework leverages sequential learning to capture the temporal evolution of acoustic signals and is systematically compared with conventional recurrent architectures, including Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRUs). Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed LSTM–AdamW model achieves superior diagnostic performance, reaching a test accuracy and macro-F1 score of 99.26% under dynamic operating conditions. The enhanced performance is attributed to the LSTM’s ability to model long-term temporal dependencies and the regularization benefits of the AdamW optimizer through decoupled weight decay. To improve transparency and physical interpretability, explainable artificial intelligence techniques based on Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are employed. The explainability analysis reveals that classification decisions are driven by localized, physically meaningful transient acoustic patterns associated with fault-induced events. In addition, a Taylor diagram–based statistical assessment confirms strong agreement between model predictions and reference signals, indicating robust preservation of temporal signal characteristics. The results suggest that the proposed explainable LSTM–AdamW framework provides a reliable, computationally efficient, and interpretable solution for acoustic signal-based fault diagnosis in aerospace applications, with strong potential for real-time condition monitoring and predictive maintenance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.