ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning algorithm reveals neurodevelopmental signatures of combined family income and neighborhood disadvantage in adolescents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Socioeconomic status (SES) has been linked to brain-based markers, but most studies rely on conventional statistical methods that overlook the complexity and inherent multicollinearity of the brain. We trained elastic net models to predict SES from multimodal neuroimaging data: diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), structural MRI (sMRI), and resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) data. Neural features independently predicted SES, and demographic information only minimally enhanced performance. The income and multimodal models performed best; accordingly, the best-performing primary model predicted income using multimodal data, achieving AUCs of 0.75 (test) and 0.811 (train) without demographic information and 0.779 (test) and 0.836 (train) with demographic information. The performance of the secondary multimodal models for predicting income had a positive relationship with income disparity; expectedly, the best performing model distinguished between children from the top and bottom ~ 10-20% of income brackets, reaching AUCs of 0.81 (test) and 0.969 (train) without demographic information and 0.863 (test) and 0.986 (train) with demographic information. Among the modalities, DTI was the most discriminative, followed by sMRI. Globally distributed along with executive functioning (EF) and language features were the most discriminative. Multimodal neuroimaging can predict SES, especially income, even without demographic data, and the most discriminative features tended to be measurements of white matter integrity and organization; more globally distributed than isolated to specific regions; and linked to cognitive control and language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.