ArticleCommunications biology2026
Controlling the human connectome with spatially diffuse input signals.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal stochastic tracking control for brain network dynamics.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Inferring intrinsic neural timescales using optimal control theory.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Cortical network dysfunction in migraine: linking genes, metabolism and clinical disability.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human brain is never at rest: its activity continuously fluctuates, transitioning between whole-brain patterns, or brain states. Network control theory provides a framework for quantifying the energy required to drive these transitions. A particularly relevant approach is optimal control, in which inputs steer the brain toward a target state. Traditionally, inputs are modeled as acting independently on individual network nodes. While convenient, this assumption neglects the spatial continuity of cerebral cortex: neighboring regions are anatomically/functionally coupled, allowing signals to spread. Moreover, brain stimulation techniques have limited spatial specificity, with effects extending beyond the stimulation site. Here, we adapt network control models to incorporate spatially extended inputs whose influence decays exponentially with distance from the input site. We show that this more realistic strategy exploits spatial dependencies in structural connectivity and activity, substantially reducing the energy required for brain state transitions. We identify near-optimal control strategies that reduce the number of inputs, in some cases by two orders of magnitude. This approximation yields network-wide maps of input site density that closely correspond to independent functional, metabolic, genetic, and neurochemical maps. Together, these findings provide an efficient and neurobiologically grounded framework for understanding optimal control of brain dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.