Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764296›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Controlling the human connectome with spatially diffuse input signals.

Richard Betzel, Maria Grazia Puxeddu, Caio Seguin, Vincent Bazinet, Andrea Luppi, Alina Podschun, S Parker Singleton, Joshua Faskowitz, Vibin Parakkattu, Bratislav Misic and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Richard BetzelDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. rbetzel@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9200-1681
Maria Grazia PuxedduDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8725-465X
Caio SeguinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Vincent BazinetMontréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6693-9641
Andrea LuppiMontréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3461-6431
Alina PodschunHumboldt-Unversität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4412-4023
S Parker SingletonDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7102-7820
Joshua FaskowitzDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Vibin ParakkattuDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Bratislav MisicMontréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0307-2862
Sebastian MarkettHumboldt-Unversität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0841-3163
Amy KuceyeskiDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5050-8342
Linden ParkesDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9329-7207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain is never at rest: its activity continuously fluctuates, transitioning between whole-brain patterns, or brain states. Network control theory provides a framework for quantifying the energy required to drive these transitions. A particularly relevant approach is optimal control, in which inputs steer the brain toward a target state. Traditionally, inputs are modeled as acting independently on individual network nodes. While convenient, this assumption neglects the spatial continuity of cerebral cortex: neighboring regions are anatomically/functionally coupled, allowing signals to spread. Moreover, brain stimulation techniques have limited spatial specificity, with effects extending beyond the stimulation site. Here, we adapt network control models to incorporate spatially extended inputs whose influence decays exponentially with distance from the input site. We show that this more realistic strategy exploits spatial dependencies in structural connectivity and activity, substantially reducing the energy required for brain state transitions. We identify near-optimal control strategies that reduce the number of inputs, in some cases by two orders of magnitude. This approximation yields network-wide maps of input site density that closely correspond to independent functional, metabolic, genetic, and neurochemical maps. Together, these findings provide an efficient and neurobiologically grounded framework for understanding optimal control of brain dynamics.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeModels, NeurologicalNerve NetHumans

Identifiers

PMID41764296
PMCPMC13066548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.