Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764284›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

Immediate effects of real time feedback and kinesiotaping on kinematics and muscle activity in athletes with dynamic knee valgus.

Taha Gheibi, Ebrahim Mohammad Ali Nasab Firouzjah, Hadi Abbaszadeh Ghanati, Thomas Gus Almonroeder

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taha GheibiMasters of Sport injury and Corrective Exercise, Department of Exercise Physiology and Corrective Exercise, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Ebrahim Mohammad Ali Nasab FirouzjahDepartment of Exercise Physiology and Corrective Exercise, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. Ebrahim.mzb@gmail.com.
Hadi Abbaszadeh GhanatiDepartment of Biomechanics and Sports Injury, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Thomas Gus AlmonroederBrooks College of Health Professions at Trine University, Fort Wayne, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic knee valgus (DKV) is a significant risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Real-time feedback (RTF) and Kinesio taping (KT) are common interventions used to prevent DKV. This study aimed to compare the immediate effects of RTF, with and without KT, on the kinematics and muscle activity in athletes with dynamic knee valgus. This randomized controlled trial study included 34 male athletes aged 20–25 years with DKV (> 10°) from jumping sports (handball, basketball, and volleyball) who were randomly assigned to two groups: RTF (age 21.94 ± 2.56 years, height 184.35 ± 5.27 cm, weight 74.50 ± 6.75 kg) and RTF + KT (age 22.29 ± 1.86 years, height 183.05 ± 6.01 cm, weight 73.50 ± 5.48 kg). Dynamic knee valgus was screened using Kinovea software during a landing from a 32 cm platform. All participants performed step-down, lateral step-down, double-leg squat and single-leg squat exercises under RTF and RTF with KT conditions. All kinematics and electromyographic variables were assessed during the single-leg vertical drop jump (SL-VDJ) task. Knee flexion, hip flexion, knee valgus and ankle dorsiflexion angles were measured by an IMU system and feedforward activity of hip and knee muscles was measured by an EMG device before and after the exercise intervention. 2 × 2 mixed-model ANOVA (group: RTF, RTF + KT, time: pretest, posttest) was used for data analysis at the significance level of p ≤ 0.05. There was a significant group-by-time interaction effect for peak knee flexion angle (F1,32=5.382, p = 0.027), gluteus medius activity (F1,32=5.9532, p = 0.004), and vastus medialis activity (F1,32=4.288, p = 0.047), with the RTF + KT group exhibiting greater pre-to-post increases in peak knee flexion, gluteus medius activity, and vastus medialis activity, compared to the RTF group. There was a significant main effect of time for peak hip flexion angle (F1,32=7.427, p = 0.010), peak knee valgus angle (F1,32=90.201, p = 0.001), peak ankle dorsiflexion angle (F1,32=4.211, p = 0.048), gluteus maximus activity (F1,32=17.069, p = 0.001), vastus lateralis activity (F1,32=35.908, p = 0.001), medial hamstring activity (F1,32=60.183, p = 0.001), and lateral hamstring activity (F1,32=36.983, p = 0.001), with both groups exhibiting similar changes over time. In summary, RTF + KT and RTF effectively altered kinematic and electromyographic ACL injury risk factors. The RTF + KT intervention demonstrated notable within-group enhancements for multiple measures, particularly in increasing knee flexion and activation of the gluteus medius and vastus medialis muscles. Consequently, while RTF alone constitutes an effective intervention, the RTF + KT combination may offer additional benefits for addressing deficits in knee flexion and specific muscle activations in athletes displaying DKV.

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic TapeKnee JointMuscle, SkeletalAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyHumansMaleRange of Motion, ArticularYoung AdultElectromyographyKinematicsMotor controlMovement retrainingVisual feedback

Identifiers

PMID41764284
PMCPMC13057237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.