ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and evaluation of a multistage transfer learning framework for robust medical image analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical image analysis is essential for accurate disease diagnosis, yet progress in developing high-performing deep learning models for medical image analysis remains limited by the scarcity of large, high-quality annotated datasets. Conventional transfer learning (CTL) from natural image pretrained models offers partial benefits but frequently encounters domain mismatch, resulting in limited generalizability to medical imaging tasks. This study reports the development and evaluation of a multistage transfer learning (MSTL) framework designed to improve domain adaptation and enhance diagnosis performance. The MSTL framework introduces an intermediate pretraining stage using cell line microscopic images to provide a more relevant source domain between ImageNet pretraining and downstream medical imaging tasks. The workflow consists of sequential pretraining on ImageNet, fine-tuning on cell line images, and final adaptation to medical datasets, including mammograms, ultrasounds, and X-rays. The study assessed MSTL performance using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs) and compared results against CTL and training from scratch. The findings show that ViTs consistently outperform CNNs, with ViTB-16 achieving the highest accuracy across all datasets. Additionally, transferability metrics, Log Expected Empirical Prediction, Negative Conditional Entropy, and H-Score, exhibited strong positive correlations with model accuracy, particularly for mammography and X-ray tasks with ViTB-16 exceeding Pearson correlation coefficients 0.95. Overall, the MSTL framework substantially narrowed the gap between general image pretraining and specialized medical imaging tasks. By improving domain adaptation and generalization, it offers a robust and scalable pathway for advancing diagnostic performance in medical image analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.