ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2026
Genetic analysis and reporting from whole-exome sequencing data in 1052 patients with intellectual disability.
Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Studying Familial Bainbridge-Ropers Syndrome Due to a NovelChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Multi-Center Study: Developing a Nomogram for Predicting Genetic Results of Trio-Based Whole-Exome Sequencing (Trio-WES) in Diagnosing Children with Syndromic Neurodevelopmental Disorders (s-NDDs).International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intellectual disability (ID) is a genetically heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder, with etiological diagnosis remaining challenging due to clinical phenotypes and genetic diversity. To investigate the diagnostic value of whole exome sequencing (WES) combined with copy number variation (CNV) analysis in unexplained ID through a large cohort analysis, and to analyze the genetic etiology of intellectual disability. Performed WES on 1052 individuals with unexplained ID, analyzing single nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions/deletions (InDels), and CNVs. Variants were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic based on clinical guidelines. Four hundred eighty-five pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants that could explain the clinical indication were identified in 458 individuals, with an overall diagnostic rate of 43.54% (458/1052). Three hundred thirty-three SNVs were detected, distributed in 178 genes, of which 222 cases were novel. Inheritance pattern analysis showed that autosomal dominant inheritance was the most prevalent (242/333, 72.67%), followed by recessive inheritance (41/333, 12.31%) and sex-linked inheritance (50/333, 15.02%), which aligns with the established role of new dominant variants in developmental disorders. By CNV analysis, we further identified 152 structural variant events with sizes ranging from 103.54 bp to 67.34 Mbp. WES with CNV analysis significantly improves molecular diagnosis in ID, particularly in cases of unclear etiology. This integrated approach elucidates diverse variantal mechanisms and enhances genotype-phenotype correlations, supporting clinical management and genetic counseling. WES combined with CNV analysis provides a powerful and economical approach for ID diagnosis. This study offers valuable insights for precision diagnosis and genetic counseling in Chinese ID populations. KEY MESSAGES: 1. Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) Significantly Enhances Diagnostic Yield in Intellectual Disability (ID) 2. WES analysis of 1052 Chinese ID patients achieved a diagnostic yield of 43.54%, surpassing chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA, 15-20%) and aligning with prior WES studies in neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). By integrating detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), insertions/deletions (Indels), and exon-level copy number variations (CNVs), WES overcomes limitations of traditional methods, particularly for patients with complex phenotypes or genetic heterogeneity. 3. SNVs Dominate the Genetic Etiology of ID 4. SNVs accounted for 68.7% (333/485) of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, reinforcing their critical role in ID pathogenesis. 5. CNV Analysis from WES Data Improves Diagnostic Efficiency 6. A total of 152 pathogenic or likely pathogenic CNVs (31.3% of all variants) were identified, including 150 patients diagnosed solely through CNV analysis, increasing the overall diagnostic yield by 14.3%. Advanced algorithms (e.g., XHMM, HMZDelFinder) enabled precise detection of small CNVs (down to single-exon deletions/duplications), positioning WES as a cost-effective clinical screening tool. 7. High-Frequency Mutated Genes Highlight Molecular Pathogenesis 8. Top five mutated genes (DUOX2, SCN2A, SHANK3, KDM5C, DDX3X) are strongly linked to neurodevelopmental dysfunction: • SCN2A (voltage-gated sodium channel) associates with epilepsy and autism spectrum disorder (ASD); • SHANK3 (synaptic scaffolding protein) is mutated in ~2% of ASD patients with comorbid ID; • KDM5C is a common X-linked ID gene. 9. Incidental Findings: Clinical and Ethical Implications 10. 4.09% (12/1052) harbored actionable incidental variants unrelated to ID (e.g., hereditary cancer or metabolic disorders). Balancing clinical actionability with psychological burden requires standardized reporting frameworks to maximize patient benefit while minimizing harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41764152What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.