Observational studyAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Safety and Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Immunotherapy in Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Analysis (NEO-EC-01).
Observational study in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06828718 (Comparison of the Prognosis and Safety of Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Modalities in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of the Prognosis and Safety of Different Neoadjuvant Treatment Modalities in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A National Multicenter Real-World Study(NEO-EC)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC), although perioperative immunotherapy has shown considerable promise. The integration of immunotherapy with nCRT (nICRT) is an innovative treatment paradigm and early-phase studies have reported enhanced pathological complete response (pCR) rates. However, comprehensive evaluations of safety, long-term prognosis, and recurrence patterns are lacking. In this multicenter real-world study, the clinical efficacy, recurrence patterns, and potential prognostic biomarkers were evaluated in patients with LA-ESCC receiving nICRT followed by esophagectomy. PATIENTS AND
methodsClinical data from patients with LA-ESCC who underwent nICRT followed by esophagectomy between September 2020 and February 2023 were retrospectively analyzed across three tertiary cancer centers. Baseline inflammatory markers (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR] and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR]) were calculated from pretreatment complete blood counts. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs), survival outcomes, and recurrence patterns were rigorously assessed.
resultsAmong the 71 enrolled patients, all achieved R0 resection (100%). The pCR and major pathological response (mPR) rates were 50.7% (36/71) and 77.5% (55/71), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 25 patients (35.2%), predominantly neutropenia (31.0%, 22/71) and radiation oesophagitis (7.0%, 5/71). Postoperative complications included anastomotic leakage (4.2%, 3/71) and pneumonia (15.5%, 11/71). With a median follow-up of 36.5 months (95% CI: 29.8-43.2), the 2- and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 81.5 and 70.6%, and the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 70.3 and 58.0%, respectively. Recurrences included locoregional (12/71, 16.9%; 11 nodal, 1 anastomotic) and distant metastases (23/71, 32.4%; lung [8], bone [5], pleura [5], liver/brain/adrenal gland/chest wall [2 each] and extra-nodal [5]). Multivariate analysis revealed that pathological N stage was an independent prognostic factor for both OS and DFS (P < 0.05), whereas elevated PLR was associated with worse DFS (P < 0.05). Notably, non-pCR patients receiving adjuvant therapy (n = 20) had superior 2-year OS (75% versus 53.3%) and DFS (54.5% versus 33.3%) than untreated patients did (n = 15; P < 0.05).
conclusionsnICRT demonstrates acceptable safety and efficacy in patients with LA-ESCC, with distant metastasis as the main recurrence pattern. The pretreatment PLR may serve as a prognostic biomarker, and adjuvant therapy improves survival in non-pCR patients. These findings warrant validation in prospective studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The trial registration number is NCT06828718.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41764126What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.