Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41764110›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2026

Comparison between DNA- and RNA-based nucleic acid amplification tests for detecting Mycoplasma pneumoniae in pediatric specimens.

Boyi Jiang, Hanqing Zhao, Chao Yan, Mingxuan Wang, Zhen Wang, Yanling Feng, Shijie Wang, Jing Yuan, Yuehua Ke

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Boyi Jiang *Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Hanqing Zhao *Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chao Yan *Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Mingxuan Wang *Capital Center for Children's Health, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhen WangCapital Center for Children's Health, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yanling FengCapital Center for Children's Health, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shijie WangCollege of Food Science and Biology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China. wangshijie@hebust.edu.cn.
Jing YuanCapital Institute of Pediatrics, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. yuanjing6216@163.com.
Yuehua KeCapital Institute of Pediatrics, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. yuehuakebj@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMycoplasma pneumoniae, a globally prevalent cause of community-acquired pneumonia in children and young adults, is typically diagnosed using molecular methods, including DNA- or RNA-based nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). While RNA-based NAAT is considered to reflect the viability and replication status of M. pneumoniae, a direct comparison of the clinical performance between DNA- and RNA-based NAATs has been lacking. This study aimed to compare these NAATs in clinical pediatric M. pneumoniae samples and elucidate the reasons for their differential detection outcomes.

methodsThis study analyzed clinical M. pneumoniae samples from pediatric patients across different sample types, seasons, age, and sex subgroups between January and December 2018. The underlying reasons for their differential detection outcomes were further elucidated through in vitro culture and cell infection models.

resultsA total of 3180 clinical samples were analyzed. The performance of DNA- and RNA-based NAATs showed specific disparities, particularly associated with sample type and patient age, but not with sampling season or patient sex. In vitro experiments revealed that M. pneumoniae-RNA (MP-RNA) has higher synthesis and degradation rates, whereas M. pneumoniae-DNA (MP-DNA) accumulates and is sustained longer in the growth dynamics of the pathogen.

conclusionThe differential nucleic acid kinetics of M. pneumoniae across respiratory microenvironments likely explain the observed variations in clinical detection. These findings may enable evidence-based selection of DNA- or RNA-based NAATs according to patient age and sample type, thereby improving the reliable detection of M. pneumoniae in children.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycoplasma pneumoniaeNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPneumonia, MycoplasmaRNA, BacterialAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCommunity-Acquired PneumoniaFemaleHumansInfantMaleSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, BacterialRNA, BacterialChildrenDNA-based nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)Mycoplasma pneumoniaeRNA-based NAATSubgroup

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.