ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Affect Labeling During Pictorial Encoding Enhances Their Recognition and Reduces Amygdalar Responses to Negative Pictures.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAffect labeling, which entails identifying the emotional content of an event, is a critical strategy for implicit emotion regulation. Previous studies have shown that affect labeling influences the encoding memory stage of negative events. However, it remains unclear whether affect labeling during encoding of negative events affects subsequent memory stages related to these events, such as retrieval.
methodsThe current behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study aimed to investigate whether affect labeling during encoding of emotional pictures influenced behavioral performance and neural responses during recognition memory of these pictures. To address this issue, 37 participants in the present study were instructed to label the emotional content of negative or neutral pictures, label the person-related content, or simply view the pictures. Participants were then re-exposed to the pictures along with several new ones and were asked to indicate whether they had previously seen each prompted picture.
resultsBehavioral results showed that affect labeling during pictorial encoding subsequently increased recognition performance across all pictures. fMRI results revealed that during the encoding phase, negative pictures in the affect labeling condition elicited greater amygdala activation compared to the person labeling and viewing conditions, with this effect being even more pronounced relative to neutral pictures. More importantly, during the recognition phase, prior affect labeling reduced amygdalar responses specifically to negative pictures, which made comparable the responses observed for neutral pictures.
conclusionThese findings suggest that affect labeling during encoding of negative events modulates their memory formation, thereby influencing subsequent retrieval of those events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.